dc.description.abstract |
The application of a semiotic approach in biology or ecology is
fundamentally different from applying mathematical or physical methods in
life science. Semiotic biology, as well as semiotic ecology, means that we step
over the limits of natural science, and what we get is thus an extended
biology, (biosemiotics), and an extended ecology, (ecosemiotics), as well.
The present paper begins by defining the term “ecosemiotics” (also known as
“ecological semiotics” or “semiotic ecology”), as the study of the semiotic
interrelations between organisms and their environment .The center of
interest of ecosemiotics is not just a homo semioticus , but more generally,
an organismus semioticus. Fundamental is the question concerning the
relationship (always of a semiotic nature) between the organism and its
environment. Ecosemioticians are interested in the study of sign processes,
which are not restricted only to arbitrary and artificial signs. Ecosemiotics is
also and perhaps primarily concerned with natural signs mediating between
the organism and its environment. It is an approach to semiosis (defined as
any form of activity, conduct or process that involves signs, including the
production of meaning), based on the assumption of a very low “semiotic
threshold” between signs and “ non-signs”, if it does not reject such a
threshold altogether. Semiosis in this case is by no means restricted only to
processes in higher organisms, to culture and social convention. Any
primitive biological organism already interacts semiotically with its
environment when it selects or avoids energetic or material objects in its
environment for the purpose of its own survival. Ecosemiotics can also be
defined as the semiotics of the relationship between nature and culture. This
includes research on the semiotic aspects of the place and role of nature for
humans, what is and what has been the meaning of nature for us, humans,
how and in what extent we communicate with nature. |
en_US |