ALSERepository of Iași University of Life Sciences, ROMANIA

Comparative Analysis of Three WEEE Management Scenarios Based on LCA Methodology: Case Study in the Municipality of Iasi, Romania

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ghiga, Simona-Cecilia
dc.contributor.author Simion, Isabela-Maria
dc.contributor.author Filote, Cătălina
dc.contributor.author Roșca, Mihaela
dc.contributor.author Hlihor, Raluca-Maria
dc.contributor.author Gavrilescu, Maria
dc.date.accessioned 2024-04-29T10:32:10Z
dc.date.available 2024-04-29T10:32:10Z
dc.date.issued 2023-04-23
dc.identifier.citation Ghiga, Simona Cecilia, Isabela Maria Simion, Cătălina Filote, Mihaela Roșca, Raluca Maria Hlihor, and Maria Gavrilescu. 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Three WEEE Management Scenarios Based on LCA Methodology: Case Study in the Municipality of Iasi, Romania" Processes 11, no. 5: 1305. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11051305 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2227-9717
dc.identifier.uri https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/11/5/1305
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.iuls.ro/xmlui/handle/20.500.12811/3840
dc.description.abstract The increasing consumption of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE), correlated with the fast innovation pace in this field, generates a large amount of annual waste. The current established management practices cannot keep up with it, and the results are of increased significance given the negative effects on the environment and human health. Thus, the current study aimed to analyze the environmental impact of three different scenarios of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) management, following population awareness campaigns regarding its collection in the Municipality of Iasi, Romania. Data processing was carried out considering Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology with the established functional unit for each scenario according to the collected amount. The results were quantified using the CML2001 and ReCiPe methods and showed that the highest environmental impact was obtained for scenario II (S2) (1.59 × 10−7 pers. equiv. using the CML2001 method and 32.7 pers. equiv. using the ReCiPe method), while the lowest for scenario I (S1) (6.42 × 10−8 pers. equiv. using the CML2001 method and 13.8 pers. equiv. using the ReCiPe method). The process with the highest contribution to the total environmental impact was the collection stage for all scenarios, with the exception of scenario S2, in which case the highest value was generated for the landfill process following the application of the ReCiPe method (39.93%). The current study provides value to a critical issue in the environmental area and supports the development of sustainable WEEE management processes. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MDPI en_US
dc.rights Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject recovery en_US
dc.subject waste management en_US
dc.subject environmental impact; energy en_US
dc.subject Life Cycle Assessment en_US
dc.subject e-waste en_US
dc.title Comparative Analysis of Three WEEE Management Scenarios Based on LCA Methodology: Case Study in the Municipality of Iasi, Romania en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.author.affiliation Simona Cecilia Ghiga, Catalina Filote, Maria Gavrilescu, Department of Environmental Engineering and Management, “Cristofor Simionescu” Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Protection, “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, 73 Prof. D. Mangeron Blvd., 700050 Iasi, Romania;
dc.author.affiliation Isabela Maria Simion, Research Department, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” Iasi University of Life Sciences, 3 Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700490 Iasi, Romania
dc.author.affiliation Mihaela Roșca, Department of Horticultural Technologies, Faculty of Horticulture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” Iasi University of Life Sciences, 3 Mihail Sadoveanu Alley, 700490 Iasi, Romania
dc.author.affiliation Maria Gavrilescu, Academy of Romanian Scientists, 3 Ilfov Street, 050044 Bucharest, Romania
dc.publicationName Processes
dc.volume 11
dc.issue 5
dc.publicationDate 2023
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11051305


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International