ALSERepository of Iași University of Life Sciences, ROMANIA

The application of the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) methodology to improve meat products quality

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Frunză, Gabriela
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-27T07:54:17Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-27T07:54:17Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation Frunză, Gabriela. 2021. "The application of the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) methodology to improve meat products quality". Lucrări Ştiinţifice USV - Iaşi Seria Agronomie 64(2): 227-232.
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.iuls.ro/xmlui/handle/20.500.12811/3096
dc.description.abstract Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) it is a predictive and preventive methodology specific to non-compliance and risk management. The FMEA is a modern tool used in the purpose of identifying potential failure modes, the causes and effects of each nonconformity (on a system, subsystem, or component part), for keeping under control the technological processes and to improve the quality of finished products. The aim of this study was the application of the FMEA to improve meat products quality (pasteurized and smoked salami). The FMEA methodology application is distinguished as specificity the Action Priority (AP) establishment depending on the severity (S) of consequences of manifestation of nonconformities to the consumer, on the probability of occurrence (O) of a potential hazard for food safety and on the probability of its detection (D). The AP was determined for each category of identified potential hazards: physical (P), chemical (C) and biological (B), for all ingredients and for all stages of the technological flow for meat products. Through AP, a quantitative assessment can be made of the potential food safety problems in a system, and respectively a prioritization of implementation of preventive actions and the lowering of potential nonconformities. Based on AP, the identified potential nonconformities can be classified in the Low priority category even if the old considered Risk Priority Number (RPN) value is higher than 100 (125, for the row material storage, at the level of P hazards). On the other hand, at values lower than 100 of the RPN, the AP can be in the Medium priority category (96, for the stage of cutting, deboning, choosing meat, at the level of C hazards), the value of S being the decisive element. After corrective action (CA) application, AP was lowered, the quality of the meat products being improved. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” University of Life Sciences, Iaşi en_US
dc.subject failure modes and effects analysis en_US
dc.subject quality en_US
dc.subject hazards en_US
dc.subject meat en_US
dc.title The application of the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) methodology to improve meat products quality en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.author.affiliation Gabriela Frunză, ”Ion Ionescu de la Brad” University of Life Sciences, Iasi, Romania
dc.publicationName Lucrări Ştiinţifice USV - Iaşi Seria Agronomie
dc.volume 64
dc.issue 2
dc.publicationDate 2021
dc.startingPage 227
dc.endingPage 232
dc.identifier.eissn 2069-6727


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record